Rack2Cloud Icon
Universal Cloud Restore CalculatorRTO Feasibility Engine
>_ Architecture Feasibility Instrument

Universal Cloud Restore
Calculator

Cloud Restore Feasibility Engine

>_ Can your recovery architecture meet the RTO?

Model retrieval latency, usable throughput, recovery-path bottlenecks, and data-transfer cost against an actual RTO. It doesn't just estimate how long a restore takes. It tells you whether the architecture can meet the recovery objective.

✓ Input-driven. No telemetry required.✓ Deterministic math engine.✓ Runs entirely in your browser.

>_ 01 — Recovery Objective

50 TB
24 Hours
100%

Proportion of dataset required for full recovery.

20%

Subset needed for primary service restart.

>_ 02 — Cloud Source & Tier

Typical rehydration delay: 12 hours

>_ 03 — Recovery Path

10 Gbps
70%

Accounts for TCP overhead, API latency, and protocol efficiency.

>_ Recovery Posture Verdict

RTO Feasibility Failed (FAIL)

Total recovery exceeds target RTO by 4.3 hours.

Target vs Actual
24h Target / 28.3h Est.
Retrieval vs Transfer
12.0h thaw + 16.3h transfer
Total Window: 28.3 hours
Throughput & Bottleneck
7.00 Gbps
Bottleneck:WAN Bandwidth
Estimated Cost Exposure
$5,632
Retrieval: $1,024Egress: $4,608
Critical Recovery Set (20%)
15.3 hours
Time until primary workload service is restorable.
Critical PASS
Required Circuit Bandwidth
13.54 Gbps
Needed to achieve target RTO at 70% efficiency.
Headroom
0.74×

>_ Architecture Findings & Recommendations

Target RTO cannot be met

Total recovery time exceeds target by 4.3 hours. Increase restore path throughput, utilize a warmer storage tier, or reduce the recovery scope.

Available recovery throughput is below required rate

Current bottleneck is WAN bandwidth. You need 9.48 Gbps of effective throughput, but are capped at 7.00 Gbps.

Significant recovery cost exposure ($5,632)

Data egress and retrieval costs represent a material financial impact. Verify this aligns with your DR operational budget.